The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has released its shortlists for the 96th Oscars, and the results have sparked considerable discussion, particularly regarding the contrasting fortunes of two films: “Emilia Pérez” and “Anora.” While “Emilia Pérez” secured a field-leading six nominations across various categories, “Anora” was conspicuously absent from all shortlists, raising questions about its awards season trajectory.
“Emilia Pérez,” directed by Jacques Audiard, emerged as a significant contender, landing spots on the shortlists for Best International Feature Film, Best Original Song, Best Original Score, Best Makeup and Hairstyling, Best Sound, and Best Visual Effects. This broad recognition highlights the film’s technical and artistic achievements, signaling its potential to become a major player in the upcoming awards race. The film’s presence in multiple categories suggests a strong consensus among Academy voters regarding its overall quality and impact.
In contrast, “Anora,” directed by Sean Baker, failed to secure a single nomination on the shortlists. This outcome is particularly noteworthy given the film’s previous acclaim, which included a Palme d’Or win at the Cannes Film Festival. The absence of “Anora” from the shortlists is a surprise to many, as it was widely considered a strong contender in several categories. This development raises questions about how the film will fare in the remaining stages of the awards season.
The Academy's decision to exclude "Anora" from the shortlists contrasts sharply with the broad support for “Emilia Pérez.” The latter's success across multiple technical categories indicates a strong appreciation for its production values. The film's inclusion in the Best Original Song category, for instance, demonstrates its ability to resonate with voters on both artistic and emotional levels. The original song, as part of the film’s narrative, appears to have made a significant impression.
The shortlists are a crucial step in the Oscar process, narrowing down the field of potential nominees and providing a clearer picture of which films have gained traction with the Academy’s voting members. The six nominations for “Emilia Pérez” suggest that it has successfully navigated this initial hurdle and is poised to compete for major awards. The film’s diverse representation across categories speaks to its multi-faceted appeal.
The exclusion of "Anora," on the other hand, presents a significant challenge to its awards prospects. While it is still possible for the film to receive nominations in the main categories, its absence from the shortlists makes this outcome less likely. The film's failure to connect with voters at this stage is a development that will undoubtedly be analyzed by industry observers and awards pundits.
The shortlists represent a crucial phase in the Oscar race, and the contrasting fates of "Emilia Pérez" and "Anora" underscore the competitive nature of the awards process. The strong showing of “Emilia Pérez” demonstrates its ability to resonate with Academy voters across a range of categories. Meanwhile, the absence of “Anora” from all shortlists raises questions about its overall appeal to the Academy and its chances of securing nominations in the main categories. The next stage of the process will be closely watched to see how these two films fare.
Please sign in to comment.